Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Umar Khalid Challenges Charge Framing, Cites CDRs and Selective Prosecution

The case now sits at the charge‑framing stage that will determine if the UAPA prosecution proceeds to trial.

Overview

  • Khalid’s counsel told the Karkardooma court that call detail records place him away from the alleged January 8, 2020 PFI office meeting that the prosecution labels a key conspiratorial event.
  • The defence alleged police relied on a late, coached statement by witness Rahul Kasana, noting a prior case where a court had questioned his credibility.
  • Counsel argued there were no recoveries from Khalid and no charge‑sheet claim that he raised or received funds for any alleged conspiracy.
  • The defence said police engaged in “pick and choose” charging, pointing to WhatsApp group admins and other purported meeting participants not named as accused, including figures cited in witness statements.
  • Hearings on October 8–9 were adjourned to October 14 for further arguments; Khalid remains in custody since September 13, 2020, after High Court bail was denied on September 2, with a Supreme Court challenge listed for October 27.