Overview
- The Supreme Court, which heard arguments Tuesday, signaled through tough questions that a majority may favor Cisco.
- Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson were more open to letting the case proceed, as Cisco’s lawyer rejected the claims.
- The case tests whether the Alien Tort Statute or the Torture Victim Protection Act let plaintiffs hold corporations liable for aiding abuses overseas.
- The Ninth Circuit in 2023 revived a 2011 suit by Falun Gong members who say Cisco helped build China’s Golden Shield to track them for torture and detention.
- Reporting has cited 2008 Cisco materials that pitched the Golden Shield as a sales opportunity and claimed its tools could spot most Falun Gong content, allegations the company disputes, and a ruling expected by late June could curb similar suits.