Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Set to Hear Trump Birthright Case as Briefs Face New Scrutiny

A fresh analysis of Supreme Court briefs finds many “originalist” filings skim past Lincoln-era history central to the citizenship clause.

Overview

  • The justices will hear Trump v. Barbara on April 1, while the executive order limiting birthright citizenship remains blocked in lower courts.
  • An SCOTUSblog review of 65 merits briefs reports that many self-described originalists give little attention to slavery and Lincoln despite their relevance to the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • The analysis notes that 33 briefs invoke originalism, yet petitioner-side filings rarely engage the 1866 context, whereas Akhil Amar’s brief highlights the child-focused text and the “under the flag” understanding.
  • The U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops submitted an amicus brief urging the Court to reject the order as unconstitutional and contrary to human dignity.
  • Legal scholar Eugene Volokh publicized his amicus defending birthright citizenship on common-law grounds reinforced by Wong Kim Ark, citing narrow exceptions for diplomats, hostile occupiers, and then-separate tribal members.