Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Seeks Centre and ECI Response on Plea to Cap Party Election Spending

The petition by Common Cause and CPIL challenges the Section 77 explanation that excludes party expenses, citing the 2024 electoral bonds judgment.

Overview

  • The bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, with Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M. Pancholi, issued notices to the government and Election Commission, returnable on April 27.
  • NGOs Common Cause and the Centre for Public Interest Litigation, represented by advocate Prashant Bhushan, argue that unchecked party spending distorts democratic competition.
  • The plea seeks statutory ceilings on political party expenditure, mandatory disclosure of actual spending, and a declaration that Explanation 1(a) to Section 77(1) is unconstitutional.
  • Justice Bagchi questioned how caps could be enforced given funds routed through associates or third parties and flagged potential conflicts with Article 19(1)(a) free expression.
  • The filing cites Law Commission and ECI recommendations and contends that strict candidate limits are undermined because party outlays are excluded, creating an uneven playing field.