Overview
- The Supreme Court’s 9–0 decision on Wednesday restored First Choice’s federal lawsuit over New Jersey’s donor-identity subpoena.
- The Court held that forcing a nonprofit to reveal its donors can chill speech and association, which counts as a present First Amendment harm.
- The justices remanded the case for further proceedings, so New Jersey can still try to prove consumer-protection violations in court.
- New Jersey’s probe began after a 2023 consumer alert that said crisis pregnancy centers do not provide abortions and may mislead patients about the procedure.
- The ruling lets nonprofits seek swift federal review of state subpoenas, a shift praised by civil-liberties groups and described as narrow by reproductive-rights advocates.