Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Refuses to Hear Jairam Ramesh Writ on Post‑Facto Environmental Clearances

Calling review the proper remedy, the bench prompted withdrawal after warning of exemplary costs.

Overview

  • A bench of Chief Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymalya Bagchi declined to entertain the Article 32 petition challenging ex‑post facto environmental clearances.
  • The court said the plea effectively sought to review its November 2025 judgment through a writ and asked if it was filed for media publicity.
  • Counsel withdrew the petition with liberty to pursue appropriate remedies, including a review of the November ruling.
  • The three‑judge bench in November 2025, by a 2:1 majority, had revived 2017 and 2021 MoEFCC office memoranda allowing post‑facto clearances, citing risks to public projects worth about ₹20,000 crore, with Justice Ujjal Bhuyan dissenting.
  • Following the November decision, the Centre issued a January 2026 memorandum to implement it, and the court has now listed related matters for hearing on Monday while urging lawyers to act responsibly.