Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Supreme Court Questions Shaadi.com's Role in Matrimonial Cases

The remitted Hyderabad fraud case now stands to clarify how courts attribute responsibility to matchmaking sites.

Overview

  • During a matrimonial dispute hearing, Justice JB Pardiwala asked "What do we do with this shaadi.com?" after learning the estranged couple met on the platform and directed another attempt at mediation.
  • On February 3, the Supreme Court granted Shaadi.com founder Anupam Mittal eight weeks' interim protection from coercive action and set aside a Telangana High Court order that had refused to quash proceedings.
  • The apex court remitted the matter to the Telangana High Court for a fresh merits-based review that could determine the extent of a platform’s liability when users defraud each other.
  • The Hyderabad complaint at issue alleges a woman was duped of nearly Rs 11 lakh by a man who created a fake profile, while Mittal has argued the site is only a matchmaking service and cannot be blamed for off-platform interactions.
  • Police and cybercrime units report rising scams tied to matrimonial sites and have urged users to verify profiles and avoid sharing personal or financial information early in conversations.