Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Study Finds AI Weather Models Miss the Mark on Extremes

The findings suggest agencies should not rely on current AI systems for disaster alerts.

Overview

  • The Science Advances study published Thursday found leading AI systems — GraphCast, Pangu-Weather and Fuxi — underpredicted the intensity and number of extreme events compared with Europe’s physics-based HRES model from ECMWF.
  • Researchers trained the AI on weather from 1979 to 2017 and checked forecasts against real extremes in 2018 to 2020, where errors grew as events became rarer and stronger.
  • The shortfall stems from training data with few record heat waves, cold snaps or severe storms, while numerical models encode physical laws that better handle rare conditions.
  • Germany’s weather service DWD began running the AI model AICON for three-hour updates in early March, yet experts caution current AI is not ready to anchor severe-weather alerts.
  • Scientists point to probabilistic ensembles that produce many plausible forecasts, hybrid designs that build in physics, and synthetic extreme-event data as paths to improve performance as climate change drives harsher weather.