Overview
- In an 8–2 vote, the Court held that campaigns by civil-society groups to discourage funding or institutional support are protected as free expression.
- Civil remedies such as halting campaigns or removing online content are allowed only with proven bad faith, defined as knowing falsehood or gross negligence in fact-checking.
- The case originated with Projeto Esperança Animal’s challenge to a ruling that censored criticism of alleged cruelty at the Festa do Peão de Barretos.
- Minister Alexandre de Moraes authored the thesis that prevailed after an earlier virtual session led by then-Justice Luís Roberto Barroso.
- Justices Edson Fachin and Luiz Fux dissented over the ruling’s scope, while Minister Flávio Dino backed the majority, noting boycotts are not illicit absent false claims.