Overview
- Christopher Blake Griffith filed a motion asking a judge to compel Stefon Diggs to turn over financial records that would show any money or deals he lost because of the dispute.
- Griffith’s lawyers say Diggs has stalled the evidence‑sharing process and “does not get to sue and hide,” while Diggs denies the assault claims and is pursuing a federal defamation case.
- The court has not ruled on the request, which could force sensitive disclosures and affect how NFL teams assess Diggs as he looks for a new contract in free agency.
- The civil fight stems from Griffith’s 2025 posts accusing Diggs of drugging, sexually assaulting, and threatening him after a 2023 night out, allegations Diggs calls fabricated for online attention.
- In a separate filing reported by media outlets, Griffith argues other events—such as a public breakup, a viral yacht video, and a decline in play—could explain any reputational harm, and Diggs also faces an unrelated criminal case after pleading not guilty in February with a trial set for early May.