Particle.news
Download on the App Store

South Africa’s Top Court Bars Repeat Asylum Claims After Final Rejection

The court said the Refugees Act contains no mechanism for second bids, leaving any fix to lawmakers.

Overview

  • South Africa’s Constitutional Court, ruling Tuesday, upheld Home Affairs’ appeal and struck down a 2024 Supreme Court of Appeal decision that had allowed two rejected applicants to file new claims.
  • The case concerned Burundian nationals Amina Irankunda and Arava Niyonkuru, who argued they became “sur place” refugees — people who qualify due to events after leaving home — following Burundi’s 2015 unrest.
  • Writing for the majority, Justice Jody Kollapen said the Refugees Act is silent on reapplications and warned that allowing them would create a never‑ending loop the courts cannot write into law.
  • The decision means people with final refusals now fall under the Immigration Act, which can speed deportation and restricts access to refugee reception offices.
  • Rights groups warned of refoulement risks and urged lawmakers to create a process for changed‑circumstance claims, as Home Affairs celebrated the win and protests over illegal immigration continued in parts of the country.