Overview
- The 8th Civil Chamber of the São Paulo Court of Justice unanimously reversed a lower-court dismissal on Feb. 4 and ordered moral-damages compensation of R$30,000.
- The case arose from a 2024 mayoral debate in which Tabata Amaral used the phrase and later posted the clip, which court records say surpassed 1.5 million views.
- Relator Ronnie Herbert Barros Soares wrote that the statement exceeded freedom of expression and that the existence of investigations does not permit calling someone a thief.
- The panel referenced earlier decisions by TRE-SP and TSE that deemed the expression irregular or abusive in electoral propaganda.
- Amaral said she will appeal to the Superior Court of Justice and the Supreme Federal Court, while Nunes praised the ruling as a reprimand.