Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Securities Lawsuits Filed Against POET Technologies Over PFIC Tax Allegations

The complaints say POET downplayed the risk of being labeled a passive foreign investment company, a designation that can impose complex tax burdens on U.S. shareholders.

Overview

  • Multiple plaintiff firms issued investor notices on Monday, June 8 and set a June 29 deadline for shareholders to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the cases.
  • The complaints allege violations of Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act and SEC Rule 10b-5 for false or misleading public statements.
  • A central claim is that POET misrepresented its tax status by minimizing the likelihood it would be deemed a passive foreign investment company, which can trigger unfavorable U.S. tax rules and extra reporting for individual holders.
  • One complaint from The Schall Law Firm also accuses CFO Thomas Mika of breaching a business agreement by discussing company deals in a public interview and harming POET’s business prospects.
  • The litigation is at an early procedural stage with no certified class or appointed lead plaintiff and next steps include lead-plaintiff selection, possible motions by defendants, and then potential merits discovery.