Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Rajasthan High Court Rejects Vikram Bhatt’s Bail Plea, Declines To Quash Cheating FIR

The judge cited prima facie evidence of dishonest diversion of investor funds warranting continued inquiry.

Overview

  • The court said the case cannot be treated as a mere contractual dispute, pointing to alleged siphoning, diversion of funds, intermediary accounts, and inflated or fictitious invoices.
  • It allowed the police probe to proceed, with records describing the investigation as at a crucial stage examining financial trails, vendor payments, and linked roles.
  • Udaipur businessman Dr Ajay Murdia filed the complaint, alleging an initial ₹7 crore investment and further funding for four films valued up to about ₹47 crore, with coverage also citing totals near ₹30–42 crore.
  • Vikram Bhatt and his wife, Shwetambari, were arrested in December in Mumbai and remain in judicial custody after earlier denials of anticipatory and medical bail.
  • State submissions referenced prior litigations and insolvency indicators and alleged tampering with witnesses and evidence in urging continued criminal proceedings.