Overview
- The bench ruled on February 25, 2026 that the record did not disclose even a prima facie case of conspiracy, cheating or corruption against Bhupinder Singh Hooda or Associated Journals Limited.
- It set aside the Special CBI Court’s April 16, 2021 order framing charges and quashed all subsequent proceedings, resulting in the discharge of the petitioners.
- The court noted the 2005 re-allotment was unanimously ratified by HUDA in 2006, AJL paid the re-allotment price and extension fee, completed construction, and obtained an occupation certificate in 2014.
- Government auditors had dropped objections about any financial loss, and the judge described the CBI’s loss claim as “fictional,” with no grievance raised by the authority or demand for compensation.
- Rebuking the investigation, the court pointed out the FIR was based on a source report and faulted the CBI for unilaterally terming the re-allotment unlawful, even as the agency had alleged allotment at 1982 rates.