Overview
- Special Judge Amol Shinde ruled that Gandhi must either accept the summons order or challenge it before a higher court and should not comment on orders left unchallenged.
- The directive followed objections from Satyaki Savarkar’s lawyer to a filing by Gandhi’s counsel that alleged the summons was secured through undue pressure and overreach.
- The court disposed of Savarkar’s application without requiring Gandhi to explain those remarks.
- During the complainant’s evidence, a sealed CD said to contain Gandhi’s 2023 speech was found blank in court, leading Savarkar’s side to seek an adjournment and a probe.
- The court rejected Gandhi’s separate plea to deny further adjournments and listed continuation of the complainant’s evidence for December 5 in Pune.