Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Plaintiff Firms Step Up uniQure Solicitation After FDA Rebuke, With April 13 Lead-Plaintiff Deadline

Investor solicitations intensify following an FDA official’s public dispute of uniQure’s trial design.

Overview

  • - Multiple shareholder firms, including Hagens Berman, DJS Law Group, the Schall Law Firm, Faruqi & Faruqi, and ClaimsFiler/KSF, urged investors to seek lead-plaintiff status by April 13, 2026.
  • - Notices reference early March reports that an FDA official labeled AMT-130 a "failed therapy" and accused uniQure of using a distorted comparison instead of a proper study.
  • - The official disputed uniQure’s characterization of a sham-surgery requirement, saying the agency sought only one to three small scalp nicks under minimal anesthesia.
  • - The same official said the FDA never agreed to accept ENROLL-HD natural history data as a primary comparator and questioned eligibility for streamlined rare-disease pathways.
  • - The pending SDNY class action, Scocco v. uniQure, cites the company’s Nov. 3, 2025 disclosure that upended its BLA timeline and preceded a share drop of more than 49%.