Particle.news
Download on the App Store

MPs Vote on Referring Starmer to Privileges Committee Over Mandelson Vetting Row

The vote tests Starmer’s claim that no improper pressure shaped the security checks for Peter Mandelson.

Overview

  • Lawmakers are debating a referral to the Commons Privileges Committee on Tuesday, and Labour has told its MPs to vote against launching the inquiry.
  • Morgan McSweeney, Starmer’s former chief of staff, told MPs on Tuesday that he made a serious mistake in advising the Mandelson appointment.
  • Former Foreign Office head Sir Philip Barton said it was unusual to announce an ambassador before security vetting was finished, underscoring concerns about the process.
  • Written evidence from FCDO security lead Ian Collard said he felt pressure for a rapid outcome due to regular No 10 contact, though he said it did not change his team’s judgment, echoing Olly Robbins’s account of constant chasing.
  • The dispute turns on whether UK Security Vetting urged denial while the Foreign Office approved clearance with safeguards, a breakdown that led Starmer to sack top mandarin Olly Robbins and to hand sensitive files to Parliament’s security committee as parties invoke the Johnson Partygate precedent before local elections.