Overview
- In a 7–2 vote on March 3, the Court adopted Minister Hugo Aguilar Ortiz’s project in Amparo en Revisión 527/2025.
- The case involved a UNAM Law student in open modality who paid about 3,000–3,200 pesos for a Reading Comprehension course required to satisfy the titling language requirement.
- Justices ordered UNAM to return the payment and to honor the course’s academic effect so the refund does not hinder the student’s degree process.
- The Court grounded its decision in Article 3’s 2019 reform and the principle of progressivity, ruling that budget constraints cannot be shifted onto students.
- The precedent signals that public universities may not charge for indispensable components of a bachelor’s degree and that such fees should be reviewed and withdrawn.