Overview
- Imelda Garza Tuñón’s lawyers say Guardia is pursuing a claim exceeding two million pesos, calculated using 30 days of minimum wage for each month Tuñón lived in Guardia’s home.
- The defense rejects the claim as unjustified, arguing the living arrangement was a family invitation rather than a rental or paid agreement.
- In a separate Guerrero proceeding, a forensic report questions the authenticity of the notary’s signature on the will, adding technical scrutiny to the document’s validity.
- Guardia states her family is not a party to the Guerrero action and says it was carried out with total secrecy by the filing side.
- The main succession case in Morelos continues, with Tuñón formally challenging the will over alleged forgery and a geographic inconsistency, while Guardia maintains it reflects Julián Figueroa’s intent to provide for his son.