Overview
- The court asked the state to decide if Clause 3.7 of the Transgender Persons Policy entitles transgender and intersex individuals to horizontal reservations in education and public employment
- It ordered that district and state policy committees include at least one trans woman, one trans man and one intersex person to ensure representative decision-making
- Justices raised concerns about obstacles in marriage registration for transgender and intersex couples and suggested using a Deed of Familial Association to recognize domestic unions
- The bench recorded a request to expedite a comprehensive LGBQA+ policy to extend rights protections beyond the transgender and intersex framework
- The government must report its progress on these interim directives when the case returns for hearing on September 15, 2025