Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Lawfare Analysis Challenges Trump Administration’s Narrow Reading of Birthright Citizenship

The piece argues the government's view of “subject to the jurisdiction” would have excluded many freed slaves.

Overview

  • Trump v. Barbara is before the Supreme Court over a Jan. 20, 2025 executive order seeking to deny birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of undocumented parents and temporary visa holders.
  • The new Lawfare article contends that accepting the government’s position would undermine the Citizenship Clause’s core purpose of securing citizenship for newly freed slaves and their descendants.
  • The author argues the administration’s theories—including illegal entry, purported foreign allegiance, and lack of domicile—would, if applied consistently, have denied citizenship to many freed slaves and their children.
  • The administration’s own Supreme Court brief acknowledges that the Fourteenth Amendment’s Citizenship Clause was adopted to confer citizenship on newly freed slaves and their children.
  • The analysis notes longstanding narrow exceptions for children of foreign diplomats or those born on foreign public ships and argues these do not support the executive order’s broader restrictions.