/i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_da025474c0c44edd99332dddb09cabe8/internal_photos/bs/2023/1/X/nkkB7tSdirnIUbGhakCQ/favicon-o-globo.png){kind=small}
/i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_59edd422c0c84a879bd37670ae4f538a/internal_photos/bs/2021/H/w/YbA657S3aYVfC0P9wboQ/g1-favicon.png){kind=small}
/i.s3.glbimg.com/v1/AUTH_63b422c2caee4269b8b34177e8876b93/internal_photos/bs/2018/e/e/PAMa3oQXOPBUOsGgFyFw/valor-tenant-icon.png){kind=icon}
Overview
- A federal jury in Oakland unanimously found on May 18 that Elon Musk filed his case too late and rejected his claim that OpenAI abandoned its nonprofit mission.
- The ruling removes the single largest legal threat that could have forced leadership changes or multibillion-dollar damages and opens a clearer path for OpenAI to pursue a public offering.
- Trial testimony and hundreds of internal documents entered into the public record repeatedly questioned Sam Altman’s credibility and revealed governance tensions inside OpenAI.
- Elon Musk’s lawyers said they will appeal the decision and separate legal disputes between AI rivals, including actions by xAI and SpaceX, remain active.
- Reports on May 20 say OpenAI is preparing a confidential IPO filing in the coming weeks, but analysts warn that the trial’s disclosures could make investors weigh reputational and regulatory risks before committing capital.