Overview
- Prosecutors delivered closing arguments on July 7 and the jury will now deliberate whether the evidence proves beyond a reasonable doubt that Larry Millete killed his wife, Maya, who has not been seen since Jan. 7, 2021.
- The case rests entirely on a circumstantial mosaic presented over weeks of testimony, including texts, deleted messages, internet searches, surveillance video, digital phone records, journal entries and witness accounts.
- Judicial rulings narrowed the defense: Judge Enrique Camarena barred evidence pointing to James 'Jamey' Laird as a third‑party suspect and limited certain K9 and decomposition testimony that the defense sought to use.
- Investigators recovered a vial containing coniine in the Millete home and experts discussed its hypothetical effects, but prosecutors did not present a specific cause of death and Maya’s body has never been found.
- If jurors convict, Millete faces up to 25 years to life in prison, and the case will be watched as a test of how far circumstantial proof can go in a no‑body homicide prosecution.