Overview
- The examining magistrate framed the allegations as a presunto delito de agresión sexual and asked the parties about further steps in the investigation.
- The judge rejected most of about 18 requested diligences, including seizing the complainant’s mobile phone and ordering a psychological exam of the inspector, on grounds those measures were unnecessary or irrelevant.
- The court admitted photographs of the complainant’s trousers and waist bag as evidence and left recordings submitted by the complainant on file, noting their authenticity has not been contested.
- A psychological report from the Punto Municipal del Observatorio de Violencia de Género de Rivas‑Vaciamadrid was authorized but has not yet been incorporated into the case file and remains a material outstanding item.
- The defense asked to close the case without indictment but the judge deferred that decision until the ordered diligences are completed, with the matter potentially moving to the Audiencia Provincial de Madrid if charges are filed.