Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Judge Lets Trump’s Mail‑In Voting Order Stand For Now

Because federal agencies have not acted the court declined to block the order and left open further review once agencies issue rules or lists.

Overview

  • On May 28 U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols denied a motion for a preliminary injunction, saying the plaintiffs failed to show imminent harm because no agency has yet implemented the executive order.
  • The March 31 order directs DHS and the Social Security Administration to build state-by-state 'State Citizenship Lists' of voting-age U.S. citizens and tells the U.S. Postal Service to deliver mail ballots only to voters on approved state lists.
  • The Postal Service published a proposed rule on May 29 seeking state lists of voters who received mail ballots with associated barcodes and opened a 30-day public comment period.
  • Democrats, national party committees and voting-rights groups say federal data sources used to compile the lists can be outdated or error-prone and could wrongly exclude eligible voters, and Judge Nichols said they may renew emergency relief if agencies take concrete actions that cause harm.
  • The case is still active: a separate Boston suit has a hearing scheduled in early June and further agency rulemaking or final lists would likely trigger renewed litigation that could affect mail voting ahead of the 2026 midterms.