Overview
- Test case centers on a 20-year-old plaintiff, Kaley G. M., who says platform design and recommendation systems fostered compulsive use that contributed to depression, anxiety, and body-image issues.
- Expert witness Dr. Anna Lembke testified that early exposure to social platforms can prime the developing brain for addiction by weakening self-regulation in the prefrontal cortex.
- Google’s counsel argued YouTube was not intentionally engineered to be addictive, disputed that it is a social network, and cited internal communications prioritizing quality of time spent.
- Meta’s attorney questioned causation, pointing to family dynamics, while the defense noted the plaintiff’s recent YouTube use has been minimal and denies she is addicted to the service.
- Adam Mosseri is scheduled to appear today, with Mark Zuckerberg set for Feb. 18 and YouTube CEO Neal Mohan expected next week, in proceedings watched as a potential precedent for thousands of related suits.