Overview
- The second-instance ruling by Indecopi’s Arequipa commission upholds the ORPS first-instance sanction against BCP.
- The case involves a Visa Clásica Masiva card that offered a 1% monthly refund on purchases that was not credited to the user.
- BCP claimed the cashback was a temporary, limited promotion, yet it failed to provide evidence supporting those restrictions.
- The total penalty is 6.22 UIT (S/34,210): 2.44 UIT for not substantiating promotional limits and 3.78 UIT for changing access conditions without consent.
- Indecopi cited breaches of Article 19 (duty of suitability) and Article 56.1(c) (ban on unilateral modifications), formalized in Final Resolution No. 0014-2026/Indecopi-AQP, which is publicly accessible.