Overview
- Elizabeth Hurley gave emotional evidence alleging the Daily Mail used unlawful methods including landline tapping, surreptitious microphones on her windows and access to private medical information.
- Prince Harry returned to the High Court a day after his testimony to support Hurley, at times comforting her son, after telling the court that coverage had made Meghan Markle’s life “an absolute misery.”
- Associated Newspapers Limited strongly denies any unlawful information gathering, argues the claims are out of time and says the stories were sourced legitimately from contacts, not through illegal tactics.
- Hurley rejected suggestions that friends leaked details, while Harry also disputed claims his social circles were “leaky,” during questioning by ANL’s lead counsel Antony White KC.
- The case before Mr Justice Nicklin spans dozens of disputed articles, including 14 linked to Harry from 2001–2013 and 15 cited by Hurley from 2002–2011, with the nine-week trial continuing into March before a written judgment.