Overview
- Superhuman, Grammarly’s owner, apologized and shut off the Expert Review feature, pledging a redesign that gives named experts control over whether and how they are represented.
- The tool framed AI-generated edits as coming from real journalists, authors, and academics — including deceased figures — without securing their permission.
- A class-action complaint filed in the Southern District of New York by Julia Angwin alleges unlawful commercial use of writers’ names and identities.
- Before disabling the feature, the company offered a criticized email opt-out and relied on a buried disclaimer stating the attributions were informational only.
- Testing by reporters and affected individuals found the advice could be inaccurate or off‑voice, and the agent drew on third‑party LLMs as part of Grammarly’s paid Pro offering.