Freshman Reporter’s Memoir Reopens Questions About Stanford Leadership and Campus VC Culture
The memoir argues that trustee mishandling of the university investigation exposed failures in Stanford governance.
Overview
- Theo Baker says his freshman reporting for the Stanford Daily uncovered irregularities in research co-authored by then-president Marc Tessier-Lavigne that preceded Tessier-Lavigne’s resignation and earned Baker a George Polk Award.
- Baker’s book, How to Rule the World, recounts that year and frames the episode as a test of the university’s crisis response and decision making by the Board of Trustees.
- The memoir and reviewers criticize the board for using outside lawyers and advisers in ways that worsened the crisis and for issuing a public summary that the author and reviewers describe as far weaker than the full internal report.
- Baker describes a ‘Stanford-within-Stanford’ where a small circle of students are courted by venture capitalists from freshman week, a system he says channels money and access to a select few.
- The book also details the personal cost of the reporting, including attacks on Baker’s background, and raises wider questions about how elite universities balance academic oversight, commercial ties, and accountability.