Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Fresh Comparisons Clarify Tradeoffs Among MGK, VOOG, IWM and IWO

Index design and market‑cap focus shape diversification, income, volatility and recent performance across these growth funds.

Overview

  • VOOG and MGK each list a 0.07% expense ratio, with VOOG offering a higher dividend yield near 0.49% versus MGK around 0.35%–0.40% and trailing 1‑year returns of 15.75% for VOOG versus 14.60% for MGK.
  • MGK concentrates in mega‑cap growth with roughly 60–69 holdings led by NVIDIA, Apple and Microsoft accounting for over one‑third of assets, while VOOG holds about 140 S&P 500 growth names with lower single‑name weights and broader sector spread.
  • Over five years MGK shows a slightly deeper maximum drawdown than VOOG (about -36% versus -33%) but a higher growth of $1,000 ($1,954 versus $1,880) alongside a higher beta profile.
  • In the small‑cap matchup, IWM charges 0.19% versus MGK’s 0.07%, holds about 1,951 stocks with a 1.0% yield, posts a slightly shallower five‑year drawdown (-31.91%), yet lags in five‑year growth of $1,000 ($1,256 versus $1,929).
  • VOOG versus IWO shows a fee edge for VOOG (0.07% versus 0.24%) with similar yields, steadier risk (beta 1.08 versus 1.45), a milder five‑year drawdown (-32.74% versus -42.02%), stronger five‑year growth ($1,880 versus $1,097) and 1‑year returns of 16.16% versus 15.31%.