Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Federal Judges Say Staff Used ChatGPT, Perplexity in Withdrawn Error-Filled Orders

The disclosures identify how AI entered draft rulings, prompting tighter chamber reviews, a written ban in one court, plus continued work on judiciary-wide rules.

Overview

  • Letters released by Sen. Chuck Grassley show Judge Julien Xavier Neals and Judge Henry T. Wingate acknowledged that an intern used ChatGPT and a law clerk used Perplexity in preparing draft orders.
  • The drafts were posted before standard review, then withdrawn after errors surfaced, including misquoted state law, references to nonparties, and misattributed quotes or citations.
  • Neals now has a written policy barring clerks and interns from using generative AI for research or drafting and has implemented a multi-level review process for opinions.
  • Wingate requires a second independent review of all drafts and mandates that cited cases be printed from Westlaw and attached to final drafts, noting no sensitive data was entered into AI tools.
  • Administrative Office Director Judge Robert J. Conrad said a judiciary AI task force issued July 31 interim guidance allowing cautious experimentation with verification and warned against delegating core judicial functions, as Grassley presses for stronger, permanent safeguards.