Overview
- Jefferson Farfán filed a court expediente questioning specific vouchers submitted by Darinka Ramírez, saying some items are "not reasonably attributable" to their three-year-old and may reflect costs for a second baby.
- Darinka Ramírez publicly posted receipts and size information to rebut the challenge, saying at least one receipt predates her newborn's birth and that Zara's "bebé" category covers children up to age six.
- Farfán told the court that ownership of businesses and registered assets does not equal immediate liquidity and asked judges to weigh his concurrent obligations to other children and elderly relatives when setting the pension.
- Entertainment reporters reported a Louis Vuitton purchase and Ramírez said the bag was a gift from her current partner, while her lawyer argued that the mother's purchases do not determine the father's legal payment capacity.
- Media figures including Magaly Medina have highlighted what they call inconsistencies in Farfán's liquidity argument, and the dispute remains active in court with further hearings and filings expected.