Particle.news
Download on the App Store

F1, FIA and Ecclestone Given Permission to Take Massa Crashgate Claim to Supreme Court

The leapfrog appeal asks the Supreme Court to decide whether Felipe Massa’s unlawful means conspiracy claim should have been dismissed before trial.

Overview

  • The Supreme Court granted permission for a direct 'leapfrog' appeal on June 10–11, pausing progress toward a full High Court trial while the justices decide whether the unlawful means conspiracy claim survives.
  • The litigation stems from the 2008 Singapore Grand Prix when Nelson Piquet Jr later admitted in a 2009 sworn statement that his crash had been deliberate and that the result affected Felipe Massa’s race and title hopes.
  • In October 2025 Mr Justice Jay threw out several of Massa’s claims but ruled that the tort of unlawful means conspiracy could proceed to trial, a decision the defendants sought to overturn as a matter of law.
  • Massa is pursuing up to £64 million in damages and has said he wants public recognition that the 2008 outcome was tainted, while a March 2026 High Court order required the defendants to pay him £250,000 in legal costs for recent applications.
  • The appeal raises broader legal questions about whether alleged breaches of duties by sporting bodies can be relied on by third parties and whether French-law tort elements can make those breaches actionable in UK courts.