Overview
- ED filed a criminal revision petition seeking to set aside the December 16 order that declined cognisance of its PMLA complaint against Sonia Gandhi, Rahul Gandhi and others.
- The trial court held the prosecution was impermissible because it was not founded on a police FIR for a scheduled offence, citing the PMLA scheme, a Supreme Court precedent and FATF principles.
- The ED argues the law does not require an FIR to trigger PMLA proceedings and that cognisance on a private complaint can validly ground a money-laundering case.
- The High Court is expected to list the matter next week, while the trial court allowed investigations to continue and noted an EOW FIR registered on October 3, 2025.
- The ED has cited attached proceeds and recent possession moves over AJL-linked properties—reported at roughly ₹752 crore and about ₹661 crore respectively—as it seeks to preserve assets during appellate review.