Overview
- Christina Block’s lawyer asked the court to end the proceedings, arguing live coverage and leaked case materials have shaped witness accounts and undercut an objective fact-finding.
- A child psychologist who advised Block testified about a 2022 “return concept” and post‑return visits, saying he assumed any reunification would be court‑ordered and denied discussing an abduction plan.
- The father’s attorney publicly challenged the psychologist’s expertise during questioning, prompting a courtroom rebuke and formal note in the record.
- A voice message presented in court, purportedly featuring the psychologist discussing making a protest appear Danish, led a defense attorney to question the message’s reliability and raise manipulation concerns.
- A 17-year-old daughter and the two youngest children exercised their right to refuse testimony, while an alleged organizer testified under safe conduct that Block had been informed about options to bring the children back.