Overview
- Hamilton “Phil” Fox filed a two-count complaint on Tuesday that opens formal attorney-discipline proceedings within the D.C. Court of Appeals system.
- The case stems from a Feb. 17, 2025 letter in which Martin, then interim U.S. attorney, told Georgetown Law his office would not hire its students “until this is resolved.”
- The filing asserts the letter sought to suppress a disfavored viewpoint on DEI and violated First and Fifth Amendment protections incorporated in lawyer ethics rules.
- A second count alleges Martin improperly contacted D.C. Court of Appeals judges directly, copied the White House counsel, and sought meetings outside established procedures.
- Martin can respond within roughly 20 days and could face penalties up to suspension or disbarment, while the Justice Department denounced the D.C. Bar’s action as partisan.