Particle.news
Download on the App Store

D.C. Disciplinary Counsel Files Ethics Charges Against DOJ Pardon Attorney Ed Martin

The complaint alleges he used his office to pressure Georgetown Law over its curriculum.

Overview

  • Hamilton “Phil” Fox filed a two-count complaint on Tuesday that opens formal attorney-discipline proceedings within the D.C. Court of Appeals system.
  • The case stems from a Feb. 17, 2025 letter in which Martin, then interim U.S. attorney, told Georgetown Law his office would not hire its students “until this is resolved.”
  • The filing asserts the letter sought to suppress a disfavored viewpoint on DEI and violated First and Fifth Amendment protections incorporated in lawyer ethics rules.
  • A second count alleges Martin improperly contacted D.C. Court of Appeals judges directly, copied the White House counsel, and sought meetings outside established procedures.
  • Martin can respond within roughly 20 days and could face penalties up to suspension or disbarment, while the Justice Department denounced the D.C. Bar’s action as partisan.