CCJ Reopens Debate on Cutting Criminal Age to 16

Overview

• The Chamber's Constitution and Justice Committee resumed discussion of PEC 32/2015 after relator Coronel Assis presented a favorable, narrowed report that would make 16-year-olds criminally liable only for heinous crimes, intentional homicide and bodily injury followed by death.
• The committee did not vote because proceedings were suspended when the plenary opened its Ordem do Dia, postponing a decision and leaving procedural fights over a special commission and requests for more time unresolved.
• Supporters cite CNJ figures showing about 11,542 adolescents in socioeducational measures to argue for tougher rules, while critics including the OAB and child-rights experts warn the change risks constitutional limits, harms youths by exposing them to adult prisons and is politically driven.
• The PEC also contains civil and political changes that would lower voting and candidacy ages, which raises electoral stakes and explains why chamber leaders are contesting the forum and timing for debate.
• If the CCJ admits the PEC, the proposal would still need passage in a special committee and plenary votes and faces legal challenges over whether the 18-year imputability rule is constitutionally protected.