Overview
- Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate K.N. Shivakumar on December 29 refused to take cognisance of the IPC Section 354A charge and discharged the JD(S) MLA.
- The court held that neither the complainant nor the prosecution offered a reasonable explanation to condone the delay under CrPC Section 473.
- The order noted the complainant had earlier approached the Deputy Commissioner and district police over a house demolition, undermining claims that fear deterred a timely complaint.
- The judge observed the complaint lacked specific dates, suggested fading memories and possible afterthought linked to the more serious case against Prajwal Revanna, and cautioned against multiplicity of proceedings.
- The Karnataka High Court on November 19 had quashed a Section 354 allegation and directed the trial court to decide if the 354A count could proceed despite the delay stemming from an April 2024 complaint about alleged 2020 acts.