Overview
- The policy, outlined by arXiv computer‑science chair Thomas Dietterich, bars authors for one year if a paper shows they failed to vet large‑language‑model output.
- ArXiv cites clear signs such as fake or hallucinated references and stray chatbot notes like a prompt saying a table is only illustrative.
- Cases proceed only after a moderator documents the problem and the section chair confirms it, with an appeal path for authors.
- The move builds on late‑2025 limits on computer‑science review and position papers and a January endorsement check for first‑time submitters, and it comes as arXiv prepares a July shift to independent nonprofit status to bolster enforcement.
- A Columbia University analysis found fabricated references in about 1 in 277 biomedical papers early in 2026, underscoring why preprint screening is tightening.