Overview
- arXiv now issues a one-year ban for any paper that shows incontrovertible evidence of unchecked AI output, with future uploads allowed only after peer-reviewed acceptance.
- Leaders describe this as a one-strike rule, and they say authors can appeal any decision.
- A moderator must document the problem and a Section Chair must confirm it before a ban is imposed.
- Examples of disqualifying evidence include fabricated or nonexistent references and leftover AI meta-comments such as prompts or placeholder instructions.
- The crackdown follows months of tighter screens, including a November 2025 halt on CS review and position papers and a January endorsement requirement for first-time submitters, with arXiv set to become an independent nonprofit in July to boost resources.