Overview
- The court noted that demolitions used as punishment continue in Uttar Pradesh despite the Supreme Court’s November 2024 decision rejecting “bulldozer justice.”
- The bench questioned whether demolitions immediately after an alleged offence reflect a colourable exercise of executive power and probed the state’s duty to avoid razing homes absent public need.
- Interim relief was granted to the Hamirpur petitioners, including police protection and guaranteed access to their properties, with several district and state officials added as respondents.
- The Uttar Pradesh government argued the plea is premature yet gave an oral assurance that no demolition will occur without due process and an opportunity to be heard.
- The petitioners allege a lodge and a sawmill were sealed after a relative was booked, and the High Court will take up the matter on February 9.