Particle.news
Download on the App Store

Allahabad High Court Asks Centre and ASI to Respond to Petition Seeking Taj Mahal Examination

The order could shape whether courts can compel access to a centrally protected monument for independent study and possible worship rights.

Overview

  • The High Court has asked the Union government and the Archaeological Survey of India to file written replies before it decides if a court‑appointed inspection or photography of the Taj Mahal should be allowed.
  • Petitioners who filed a 2015 declaratory suit say the site is the pre‑Mughal Shiva shrine called Tejo Mahalaya and they want formal recognition plus permission to perform Hindu rites inside the complex.
  • Lower Agra courts twice refused requests to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to survey and photograph the monument, and the petitioners moved the Allahabad High Court to challenge those refusals.
  • The ASI and mainstream historians maintain the Taj Mahal is a 17th‑century Mughal mausoleum built by Shah Jahan and say there is no archaeological evidence supporting the Tejo Mahalaya claim.
  • If the court orders an inspection it could raise fresh questions about heritage protection, access rules for a UNESCO World Heritage Site and how courts handle disputed historical claims that scholars typically resolve.