Overview
- The Alberta Court of Appeal replaced a four-year prison term with a 7½-year sentence, calling the original punishment demonstrably unfit.
- Appeal judges said the trial court made a legal error by sentencing without the victim impact statement that had been filed but went missing.
- The panel also faulted the judge for minimizing harm by comparing the injury to his own fingertip loss and by citing the woman's “hardscrabble” life.
- The victim’s statement, found weeks later, described plates in her face, chronic pain, trouble chewing solid food, repeated hospital visits, and trauma from being forced to swallow her severed finger.
- The decision signals tougher review of sentences that overlook a victim’s suffering, with clear implications for cases involving violence against Indigenous women in remote communities.