ACHP Moves to Rewrite Rules That Would Narrow Protections Under Section 106
The draft revisions narrow what counts as protected property, reduce required consultation, and shift review powers toward federal agencies.
Overview
- The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation voted to advance a draft rule that would change how federal agencies apply Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.
- The proposal would tighten the definition of historic property by adding a “geographically compact” test, exclude broad cultural and natural landscapes, and make public comment and mitigation steps weaker or discretionary.
- Architects, Tribal Nations, preservation groups and legal experts condemned the move, saying it would sideline tribal and local officials and remove communities from decisions about sites that matter to them.
- Opponents warn the change could put roughly 1.4 million known sites at greater risk, including tribal sacred places such as Oak Flat/Chi’chil Biłdagoteel, and could speed approvals for projects that affect those places.
- A public comment window and potential rapid final rule are expected, and advocates are organizing coordinated legal challenges and congressional fixes to try to block or reverse the change.